目的:分析右侧颈内静脉输液港导管置入长度的影响因素,并建立基于右侧胸骨第三肋间隙作为解剖标志测量导管长度的回归方程.方法:收集西安交通大学第一附属医院2017年9月至2018年7月行右侧颈内静脉植入式输液港的患者共190例为研究对象,均采用术中透视确定导管长度,并记录穿刺部位至右侧胸骨第三肋间隙的距离(SK-ICS).采用Pearson相关分析法分析实际置管长度与患者的年龄、身高、体质量、体质指数(body mass index,BMI)及SK-ICS的相关性,通过多元线性回归分析建立回归方程,并与其余3种常用公式进行对比.结果:导管长度与患者的身高、体质量及SK-ICS值存在正相关(P<0.05),与BMI呈负相关(P<0.05).通过多元线性回归分析得到回归方程:L=1.01xSK-ICS+0.151.该方程估算值与实际长度相比无明显差异(P>0.05),而其余3种公式估算值均长于实际值.回归方程的绝对误差与百分比值均较低,预测置管长度准确性较高.结论:通过使用体表标志建立的回归方程对导管长度的估算具有一定的临床指导价值和推广意义. 相似文献
ObjectiveO-arm® now gives us the opportunity not only to perform 2D but also 3D scans during deep brain stimulation (DBS) procedures. We present our experience with the intraoperative use of this device. Our objective was to measure the geometrical accuracy of electrode placement during surgical procedures driven under O-arm® control.MethodsFifteen patients underwent STN-DBS. For the first 4 patients, 3D scans were performed at the end of the procedure. We calculated the accuracy of electrode positioning, i.e. the distance between final electrode positioning and the planned trajectory. For the next 11 patients, who underwent both intraoperative and final 3D scan, we also calculated the accuracy of the microelectrode positioning.ResultsAverage stimulation-induced improvement of UPDRS-III score was 52.5 ± 15%. For the first 4 patients, the mean electrode positioning accuracy was 1.46 ± 0.56 mm. For the 11 patients who underwent intraoperative 3D scan, the mean microelectrodes positioning accuracy was 1.59 ± 1.1 mm. Aberrant positioning was detected in two cases, and was analyzed by fusing 3D scan with preoperative MR images. The definite electrodes positioning accuracy was 1.05 ± 0.54 mm.ConclusionIntraoperative 3D scan is feasible, and can help us detect and correct early aberrant trajectories. 相似文献
Recent studies suggest that the location of predominant pain (back or leg) can be a significant predictor of the outcome of surgery for degenerative spinal disorders. However, others challenge the notion that the predominant symptom can be reliably identified. This study examined the validity of a single item used to determine the most troublesome symptom.
Methods
A total of 2,778 patients with degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine scheduled for surgery with the goal of pain relief completed a questionnaire enquiring as to their most troublesome symptom [“main symptom”; back pain (BACK) or leg/buttock pain (LEG)]. They also completed separate 0–10 graphic rating scales for back pain (LBP) and leg/buttock pain (LP) intensity. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to determine the accuracy with which the “LP minus LBP” score was able to classify patients into their declared “main symptom” group. Sub-studies evaluated the test–retest reliability of the patients’ self-rated pain scores (N = 45) and the agreement between the main symptom declared by the patient in the questionnaire and that documented by the surgeon after the clinical consultation (N = 118).
Results
Test–retest reliability of the back and leg pain scores was good (ICC2,1 of 0.8 for each), as was patient–surgeon agreement regarding the main symptom (BACK or LEG) (κ value 0.79). In the BACK group, the mean values for pain intensity were 7.3 ± 2.0 (LBP) and 5.2 ± 2.9 (LP); in the LEG group, they were 4.3 ± 2.9 (LBP) and 7.5 ± 1.9 (LP). The area under the curve for the ROC was 0.95 (95 % CI 0.94–0.95), indicating excellent discrimination between the BACK and LEG groups based on the “LP minus LBP” scores. A cutoff score >0.0 for “LP minus LBP” score gave optimal sensitivity and specificity for indicating membership of the LEG group (sensitivity 79.1 %, specificity 95.7 %).
Conclusions
The responses on the single item for the “main symptom” were in good agreement with the differential ratings on the 0–10 pain scales for LBP and LP intensity. The cutoff >0 for “LP minus LBP” for classifying patients as LEG pain predominant seemed appropriate and suggests good concurrent validity for the single-item measure. The single item may be of use in sub-grouping patients with the same disorder (e.g. spondylolisthesis) or as an indication in surgical decision-making. 相似文献